<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Party of 1 &#187; Judiciary</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.partyof1.net/category/blog/judiciary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.partyof1.net</link>
	<description>Politics &#124; Government &#124; Investigative Journalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 15:56:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>O&#8217;Connor on Judicial Selection</title>
		<link>http://www.partyof1.net/2009/12/25/oconnor-on-judicial-selection/</link>
		<comments>http://www.partyof1.net/2009/12/25/oconnor-on-judicial-selection/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 00:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Cole</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collin Levy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Grisham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Schwartz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandra Day O'Connor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.partyof1.net/?p=2773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;A group of judges, political officials and lawyers, led by the retired Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, has begun a campaign to persuade states to choose judges on the basis of merit, rather than their ability to win an election.&#8221; So reports John Schwartz in Thursday&#8217;s New York Times.
I think that the distinguished former [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A group of judges, political officials and lawyers, led by the retired Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, has begun a campaign to persuade states to choose judges on the basis of merit, rather than their ability to win an election.&#8221; So reports <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/24/us/24judges.html?_r=1&amp;ref=politics" target="_blank">John Schwartz </a>in Thursday&#8217;s <em>New York Times</em>.</p>
<p>I think that the distinguished former justice is liable to run into resistance from the usual suspects.  Nevertheless, there is some awareness of the issue in the popular consciousness, due in no small part to a legal potboiler, &#8220;The Appeal,&#8221; by popular novelist John Grisham. Last march, the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120596897660350203.html" target="_blank"><em>Wall Street Journal</em> editorial page</a> hastened to reassure us: &#8220;At the end of the day, however, the problem isn&#8217;t the power of business groups, like the fictional chemical company in his novel. Trial lawyers in each state are the ones with the financial and organization incentive to work year-in and year-out to shape the local judiciary to their liking.&#8221;</p>
<p>Heavens, no &#8212; &#8220;the problem isn&#8217;t the power of business groups.&#8221; By all means, gentle reader, keep your head in the sand &#8212; never direct your attention to the power of business groups! But, at the very least, think about this: Would you like your most vital interests, or your very life, to be in the hands of a court of law &#8212; in which the judge had been forced to take a public position on the issue at hand, during a recent sensational election campaign for the post?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.partyof1.net/2009/12/25/oconnor-on-judicial-selection/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
